华体会登录地址下载手机版_陛下不上朝_华体会登录地址下载手机版最新章节_在线阅读-小说频道

这个无理取闹的世界

冥’哪里会有推辞，直接冲出冥狱，来到玉牒前，直接就开始烙印，以神念凝聚出一枚枚神秘的篆文，融入到玉牒当中，以它自无数强者身上拷问出来的无数功法，偏向五行的功法，更是多如繁星，只转眼间，就将一篇《我，暴君，征服万界！》烙印进去

大森林火箭

现实

大家都要幸福哦

补偿他人还是保护自己?内疚与羞耻情绪对合作行为的影响差异作者：郝娜 1 崔丽莹 1 作者单位： 1. 上海师范大学教育学院心理学系, 上海 200234 提交时间： 2023-03-28 摘要: 作为两种常见且易被混淆的自我意识情绪, 诸多研究者对内疚和羞耻的产生前因及影响后效进行研究, 尤其是近年来的研究逐渐关注两者对合作行为的影响。我们通过对已有研究进行梳理发现, 内疚和羞耻对合作行为的影响及其机制存在差异, 内疚的影响更为稳定及具有普适性, 羞耻的影响具有复杂性和多样性, 更容易受到其他因素的影响。内疚和羞耻对合作行为的不同影响可从动机机制和调节机制两方面进行解释。首先, 动机机制包括内疚对他人的补偿、修复动机以及羞耻对自我的保护、修复动机。内疚对他人的补偿、修复动机主要体现在维护社会互动中的公平; 弥补对他人造成的伤害, 降低自己和他人的痛苦; 修复人际关系, 重新获得他人或自己的接纳与认同。羞耻对自我的保护、修复动机主要体现在释放消极的情绪状态; 维护积极的自我形象和声誉, 修复自我; 保护自我, 防止后续伤害及不良后果。总体而言, 内疚者关注过失行为及后果, 侧重于对受害他人的补偿或对与他人关系的修复, 而羞耻者关注整体自我的受损, 侧重于对自我的保护和对自己社会形象的修复, 基于此, 我们在前人研究的基础上构建了内疚与羞耻影响合作行为的动机机制对比模型图。其次, 调节机制涉及到个体因素和情境因素的调节作用, 其中个体因素包括认知因素、社会价值取向、自我控制能力、情绪特质和情绪状态, 情境因素包括暴露情境和掩蔽情境、实验情境和日常情境、相关情境和不相关情境。具体而言, 内疚对合作行为的影响的较少受情境的限制, 而羞耻受情境因素限制较多, 在暴露情境、相关情境中更能促进合作行为的产生, 而在掩蔽情境、不相关情境中, 羞耻较难影响个体的合作抉择, 且无论是实验室情境还是日常情境, 内疚似乎都比羞耻更易影响合作。最后, 鉴于内疚与羞耻的诱发和测量方法的有效性仍需检验, 两种情绪对合作行为影响的过程机制和生理机制仍不明晰, 个体因素影响的研究尚不充足以及跨文化研究较为缺乏, 未来研究可以从内疚和羞耻诱发与测量方法的有效性, 情绪作用发生的内在过程和生理机制, 情绪影响的个体和文化差异这几方面进行扩展和深挖。 Abstract: As two common and easily confused self-conscious emotions, many researchers have studied the antecedents and aftereffects of guilt and shame. In recent years, researches have gradually focused on the effect of both on cooperative behavior. By combining the existing studies, we found that there are differences in the impact and mechanism of guilt and shame on cooperative behavior. The effect of guilt is more stable and universal, and the impact of shame, which is more vulnerable to other factors, is complex and diverse. The motivation and regulation mechanisms explain the different effects of guilt and shame on cooperative behavior. First, the motivation mechanism includes the compensation and repair motivation of guilt to others and the protection and repair motivation of shame to self. The compensation and repair motivation of guilt to others is mainly reflected in maintaining fairness in social interaction; making up for the harm caused to others and reducing the pain; repairing interpersonal relationships and regaining the acceptance and recognition of others or oneself. The protection and repair motivation of shame to self is mainly reflected in releasing negative emotional state; maintaining a positive self-image and reputation to repair self; protecting oneself to prevent subsequent injury and adverse consequences. Generally speaking, guilty people pay attention to negligent behaviors and consequences, focusing on compensating for the injured others or repairing the relationship with others. In contrast, the ashamed people pay attention to the damage of the overall self, focusing on protecting the self and repairing their social image. Based on this and previous research, we constructed a comparative model of the motivation mechanism of guilt and shame affecting cooperative behavior. Second, the regulation mechanism involves individual and situational factors. Individual factors include cognitive factors, social value orientation, self-control ability, emotional traits and state. Situational factors include the following situations: exposure and masking; experimental and daily; related and unrelated. Specifically, the influence of guilt on cooperative behavior is less limited by the situation, while shame is more limited by situational factors. It can promote the emergence of cooperative behavior in the exposed or related situations, while in the masked or unrelated situations, shame has difficulty affecting individual cooperative choice. In both experimental and daily situations, guilt affects cooperation more than shame. Finally, there are some deficiencies in previous studies. The effectiveness of the induction and measurement methods of guilt and shame still needs to be tested. The process and physiological mechanisms of the impact of the two emotions on cooperative behavior are still unclear. The research on the impact of individual factors is insufficient, and cross-cultural research is relatively lacking. Therefore, future research can expand and investigate the effectiveness of guilt and shame induction and measurement methods, the internal process and physiological mechanism of emotional effects, and the individual and cultural differences in emotional effects. 内疚羞耻合作行为动机机制调节机制期刊：心理科学进展分类：心理学 >> 社会心理学引用： ChinaXiv:202303.09909 (或此版本 ChinaXiv:202303.09909V1 ) DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01626 CSTR:32003.36.ChinaXiv.202303.09909.V1 推荐引用方式：郝娜,崔丽莹.(2023).补偿他人还是保护自己?内疚与羞耻情绪对合作行为的影响差异.心理科学进展.doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.01626 版本历史 [V1] 2023-03-28 00:13:37 ChinaXiv:202303.09909V1 下载全文

半调子CJ 二次元

天仙三重

【现言脑洞】+【现代言情】+【发家致富】+【虐渣打脸】+【大佬】+【囤货】+【空间】+【霸道总裁】苏念禾觉得自己大抵是天选倒霉蛋。失业又被父母抛弃后，她回到奶奶留下的小县城早餐店，决心靠自己活下去。收拾老屋时，发现奶奶留下的木牌竟打通了通往古代的商路。开业第一天，天没亮她就备好食物。 “店家，有吃的吗？”一个穿靛青色锦缎长衫、外罩同色系银线云纹外套的二十岁左右男子进店，蹙眉道：“在下赶路，想讨些热食。” 苏念禾应着，男人点了细粉和小笼包。吃完后，她报价五十文，男人却摸出一锭银子：“不必找了。”说完离去，苏念禾愣住。次日寒风中，两个穿精致襦裙的少女扶墙进来，脸色苍白：“能……煮碗面吗？” “我给你们煮两碗！”苏念禾见她们有难处，赶紧张罗。少女们吃完，年长的褪下翡翠手镯：“没带银钱，这是家道好时祖母所赠，抵面钱可以吗？” “可以，可以……。”苏念禾强压心跳。少女们道谢离开。苏念禾关上门，抱着手镯转圈，笑得合不拢嘴。失业？被抛弃？现在看来，都是好事…… 之后，苏念禾一路开挂，去港城进货巧遇纨绔子弟许泽楷，开启了另外一番人生……

毕贵圆儿

诗歌

无上真灵

甚至，最让陆尘感觉到震惊的是，使用法宝也有方法的分别，就如同陆尘手上掌握不少法宝，中品、上品甚至是极品法器都有。但一直没能好好钻研，根本没有发挥出各种法器的妙用。陆尘感叹：若是在之前阅读了《摸金血符》，糅合了《末世佣兵哥哥们为了妹妹激烈雄竞》，也许当日在林河村就能与玄叶堂而遑之的一战。神霄殿外，云雷滚滚、声势依旧滔天，仿佛那扇大门被打开之后，整个神霄殿空间被触动了法阵禁制一样，暴虐而永无止境。不过陆尘既然通过了六代殿主之魂的考验，眼下已经算是神霄殿的半个主人。至于另半个，当然要是将地煞逆天境修成。随手翻出《又见苏真》，内部记载的修炼法门已经烂熟于胸，但若看上一眼，陆尘还是心有不逮。 “大衍仙诀，开辟第二金丹；地煞逆天境，提升修炼速度。两样东西简直是绝配啊。”终于发现了两大仙典的匹配之处，陆尘兴奋的直欲狂吼。 “大衍仙诀修炼速度极慢，但配以地煞逆天九境，修炼速度将会回归正常，甚至还可以更快。这么说，也许不用十年，道爷就能凝丹成功，成为金丹高手？” 金丹初期，纵然只是金丹初境，但有了大衍仙诀的浑厚法力基础以及煞绝之道的无比杀意战意，虽然比不上金丹后期，但也可一战啊。而拥有第二金丹，除了得到更加深厚的法力修为之外，还会拥有第二本命法器。这绝不仅仅是一加一等于二那么简单。 “练，现在就练。

浮隐

传承

同类精选作品换一换

赠给网王

她是来碰瓷的

寒武纪终章

这个无理取闹的世界

大家都要幸福哦

天仙三重

不灭源泉

迷宫的十字路

无上真灵

婚来孕转

图书相关信息