澳门官方游戏app

领导每日消极反馈对员工创造力的影响机制 The effects of daily supervisor negative feedback on employee creativity Abstract 作者： 董念念 1 尹奎 1 邢璐 2 孙鑫 3 董雅楠 4 作者单位： 1. 北京科技大学经济管理学院 2. 湖南大学工商管理学院 3. 北京邮电大学人工智能学院 4. 北京航空航天大学经济管理学院 通讯作者： 尹奎 Email:mcqueenyin@ustb.edu.cn 提交时间： 2022-11-23 摘要: 关于领导消极反馈对员工创造力的影响，现有文献存在相互矛盾的观点。基于反馈干预理论，采用经验取样法探讨不同目标导向个体对领导每日消极反馈的差异性反应，以及由此导致的不同创造力水平。对来自95名被试716个观察值的多层次路径分析发现：对高证明目标导向的员工而言，领导每日消极反馈通过促进当晚问题解决反思，提升了第二天的创造力。对高回避目标导向的员工而言，领导每日消极反馈通过引发当晚情感反刍，抑制了第二天的创造力。以上研究发现有助于全面揭示领导消极反馈对员工创造力的影响效应，为领导力发展与组织创新管理提供有益借鉴。 Abstract: Previous findings regarding the impact of supervisor negative feedback on employee creativity have seemingly been inconsistent. Researchers have reported positive, negative, and nonsignificant relationships between supervisor negative feedback and employee creativity. The present study aims to explore the possibility that supervisor negative feedback has short-lived impacts on employee creativity. Drawing from feedback intervention theory, we propose that proving goal orientation moderates the indirect effect of daily supervisor negative feedback on employee next-day creativity through problem-solving pondering at night such that this effect is stronger for individuals with higher levels of proving goal orientation. In addition, we suggest that avoiding goal orientation moderates the indirect effect of daily supervisor negative feedback on employee next-day creativity through affective rumination at night such that this effect is stronger for individuals with higher levels of avoiding goal orientation. We conducted a field study using experience sampling methodology to collect data from employees of a design institute in northern China. The questionnaire survey process included an initial one-time entry survey and daily surveys administered over a period of two weeks. One week before the start of the daily surveys, participants reported their proving goal orientation, avoiding goal orientation, and demographic information. During the two-week daily survey period, participants assessed daily supervisor negative feedback and daily creativity at 5:30 p.m. and rated 21 problem-solving pondering and affective rumination at 8:30 p.m. each evening. The final sample included 716 usable observations collected from 95 employees. To test the proposed hypotheses, we conducted two-level path-analyses using Mplus 8.0 and performed a Monte Carlo simulation procedure using R software. As hypothesized, employees with different goal orientations reacted differently to daily supervisor negative feedback. The results showed that the relationship between daily supervisor negative feedback and problem-solving pondering at night was positive when proving goal orientation was high. We also found that the relationship between daily supervisor negative feedback and affective rumination at night was positive when avoiding goal orientation was high. Furthermore, for employees with high levels of proving goal orientation, daily supervisor negative feedback promoted their creativity the next day by activating their problem-solving pondering at night. However, for employees with low levels of proving goal orientation, this indirect effect was not significant. In addition, for employees with high levels of avoiding goal orientation, daily supervisor negative feedback inhibited their creativity the next day by eliciting their affective rumination at night. However, for employees with low levels of avoiding goal orientation, this indirect effect was not significant. The current study makes several theoretical contributions. First, we adopt a dynamic perspective to capture the within-person variance in creativity resulting from daily fluctuations in supervisor negative feedback. Second, this study enrichesfeedback intervention theory by exploring the mediating roles of problem-solving pondering and affective rumination in the link of supervisor negative feedback with employee creativity. Third, the present study reconciles the conflicting findings of previous research by demonstrating the differential effects of daily supervisor negative feedback on employees with different goal orientations. 领导消极反馈 目标导向 问题解决反思 情感反刍 创造力 来自： 董念念 分类： 心理学 >> 管理心理学 引用： ChinaXiv:202211.00303 (或此版本 ChinaXiv:202211.00303V1 ) DOI:10.12074/202211.00303V1 CSTR:32003.36.ChinaXiv.202211.00303.V1 推荐引用方式： 董念念,尹奎,邢璐,孙鑫,董雅楠.(2022).领导每日消极反馈对员工创造力的影响机制.中国科学院科技论文预发布平台.doi:10.12074/202211.00303V1 版本历史 [V1] 2022-11-23 15:15:08 ChinaXiv:202211.00303V1 下载全文

2011年5月2日，出演励志偶像剧《你不准给我捏肩妻管严的尊严》。

非传统兽世+雄全洁+全员恋爱脑+异能+非女强 打工人唐软最近总梦到一个叫兽世的地方。 狼族族长是欧美大帅哥，冰蓝色眼睛，银灰色头发，身材完美还忠诚！ 他说：“我的生命与你同在。” 蛇王手握半个兽世，碧色的眸子盛满深情，霸道又温柔！ 他说：“我以整个兽国，承诺对你的爱。” 狐族小王子是兽世最美雄性，体贴撒娇太上头！ 他说：“我每想你一次，就在墙上画一条线。你再不抱我……我就要死了。” 还有神秘兽人强大到可毁天灭地。 他说：“你最好搞清楚，谁才是你的第一兽夫。” 以及…… 唐软怀疑自己工作压力太大，撞鬼了。 本想找个算命先生破解下. 结果当天，就为救狗老板的儿子，水灵灵的穿越了……

她们家世出众漂亮优秀，但一遇上男女主，就成了降智炮灰，燃烧自己成全男女主的爱情，直到生命的最后一刻。 而顾陌，现在就成了无数小说中的她们。 系统：大佬，打脸虐渣拆CP你可以的！上！ 顾陌：我流弊！我可以！ 许久后，系统看着在现代位面搞事业、在丧尸位面搞事业、在古代位面搞事业，到了修仙世界还在搞事业的宿主，懵哔了。 说好的打脸虐渣拆CP呢？这个宿主，简直有毒。 顾陌：搞事业不香吗？当人生赢家不香吗？

捡到一只残次实验体是作家玉米球球的最新作品,提供捡到一只残次实验体免费阅读,捡到一只残次实验体

老实人女主x至高无上光明神切片男主】七人分别承载七宗罪，主角是老实人，为了回家不得不攻略男主，任务是救赎这七个“罪之容器”。路西法（傲慢之神）、利维坦（嫉妒之神）、萨麦尔（暴怒之神）、贝尔芬格（懒惰之神）、玛门（贪婪之神）、别西卜（暴食之神）、阿斯蒙蒂斯（色欲之神）。攻略成功的最后一秒女主死遁了，七位神的怒火令位面崩塌，女主不得不冒着生命危险面对黑化的七位堕神，系统再次发布任务

嘉靖二十六年，公元1547年。 穿越大明，阎赴寒窗苦读二十六载，本该钦点状元郎，因样貌彪悍，形象粗犷遭道君皇帝厌嫌。 从而被列入殿试倒数第一。 家人积蓄，日夜苦读，昔日对大明的期待，全部烟消云散。 阎赴发出了黄巢一样的声音：“打进大明比考进大明容易！” 天下谁人不识君！

【末世+系统+腹黑+无敌+囤物资+多子多福】 末世来临，丧尸爆发，在服装店上班的林尧碰巧救下美艳老板娘，原本尖酸刻薄总是克扣林尧工资的老板娘，为了一口面包，只能跪求收留！ 林尧觉醒多子多福系统，获得各类异能，从此开启了强大之路。 白天，林尧是人类救世主；夜晚，林尧化身尸王，发展丧尸军团......

和失忆对家恋爱了是作家周时落的最新作品,提供和失忆对家恋爱了免费阅读,和失忆对家恋爱了